Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13163
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKostruba, Anatoliy-
dc.contributor.authorКоструба, Анатолій Володимирович-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T10:20:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-04T10:20:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-04-
dc.identifier.citationKOSTRUBA, Anatoliy V. Jurisdictional remedies for corporate rights in Ukraine: Sub-standard remedies in corporate disputes. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, Belo Horizonte, ano 04, n. 07, p. 17-35, jan./ jun. 2022. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.2.uk_UA
dc.identifier.other10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.2.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13163-
dc.descriptionhttps://rbadr.emnuvens.com.br/rbadruk_UA
dc.description.abstractIn the context of the European integration processes taking place in Ukraine, there is a convergence of the national legal system with the legal principles and provisions of the European Union, including in the field of corporate legal relations. The main purpose of this study was an independent study of problematic issues that arise upon the implementation of sub-standard remedies in corporate disputes to develop author’s conclusions and recommendations to ensure sustainable and effective law enforcement practices. The methodological framework of this study included the principles of cognition of social phenomena in their historical development, interrelation, and interdependence, a dialectical approach to the study of theory and practice, the history and current state of law. The leading methods were historical, comparative legal, and dialectical. Based on the results of the investigation, the study covered the leading issues of the state of modern legal regulation of sub-standard remedies in corporate disputes in Ukraine; analysed the main issues of theoretical certainty regarding sub-standard remedies in corporate disputes and suggested new vectors of reforms concerning further improvement of law enforcement practice. The author’s conclusion on the need to ensure the unity of law enforcement practice by introducing changes to the legislation of Ukraine towards detailed regulation of sub-standard remedies in corporate disputes, which also correlates with the reformation vectors of development of Ukraine in the context of European integration, will become a stable basis for further scientific research and legislative transformations in the field under study.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.subjectKostrubauk_UA
dc.subjectCivil Lawuk_UA
dc.subjectcompany lawuk_UA
dc.subjectcorporative lawuk_UA
dc.subjectcorporationuk_UA
dc.subjectsqueeze-outuk_UA
dc.subjectsell-outuk_UA
dc.subjectfreeze-outuk_UA
dc.subjectкорпораціяuk_UA
dc.subjectкорпоративний контрольuk_UA
dc.subjectзахист корпоративних правuk_UA
dc.subjectlegal remediesuk_UA
dc.subjectюридична особаuk_UA
dc.subjectцивільне правоuk_UA
dc.subjectкорпоративное управлениеuk_UA
dc.subjectюридическое лицоuk_UA
dc.titleJurisdictional remedies for corporate rights in Ukraine: Sub-standard remedies in corporate disputesuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Appears in Collections:Статті та тези (ННЮІ)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
6548-2_Anatoliy V. Kostruba_RBADR.pdfПублікація (англ.мова)164.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.